La página que intenta visitar sólo está disponible en inglés. ¡Disculpa!
The page you are about to visit is currently only available in English. Sorry!

While political attacks on the Endangered Species Act are nothing new – it seems every year there’s a move in Congress to weaken it – this year has seen a number of unfortunately developments. For us here in California, the Endangered Species Act is particularly vital to protecting some of our most compelling bird species. In total, sixteen California bird species are protected under the federal Endangered Species Act, including some of our most compelling ones such as the Western Snowy Plover, Northern Spotted Owl, California Least Tern, and the big daddy of them all, the California Condor.
The biggest current threat to the Endangered Species Act comes not in the form of legislative changes to the Act, but rather through proposed regulatory changes from the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service, which are two of the main branches of the federal government tasked with enforcing its provisions. The proposed changes are numerous, but the most troublesome are as follows:
These proposed regulatory changes to the enforcement of the Endangered Species Act are particularly dangerous because they can be implemented administratively without Congress weighing in. Because the Endangered Species Act is one of the most popular laws ever passed by Congress, lawmakers have been reluctant to own votes weakening it. The National Audubon Society has already taken a stand against these proposed changes, and you can lend your voice, as well.
Legislative moves
This year, there are a number of bills moving, mostly through the House of Representatives, that would roll back aspects of the Endangered Species Act. The prospects for nearly all of these are dim, but there is one effort that got a lot of attention earlier this year. In July, Sen. John Barrasso, a Republican from Wyoming, released a draft bill to overhaul the Endangered Species Act. Barrasso chairs the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee and had worked with the Western Governors Association to draft the proposal.
Moves against the Western Yellow-billed Cuckoo
Responding to a request from ranchers, miners, and other industry groups, the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service earlier this year agreed to conduct a listing review of the Western Yellow-billed Cuckoo. Opponents of the listing are challenging the distinct population status of the bird, claiming that it is not distinct from its Eastern counterpart. The Western Yellow-billed Cuckoo was listed as Threatened in 2014 in response to a rapid decline in numbers across the West.
Once plentiful, Western yellow-billed cuckoos are now gone from British Columbia and the Pacific Northwest, and most of the remaining birds are found in isolated patches of riparian habitat along rivers in Arizona, California, and New Mexico. Audubon California supported that listing, and more than 2,200 activists submitted comments in support, as well.
Audubon California’s Kern River Preserve is one of the key sites for the Yellow-billed Cuckoo in California.
Lawsuit challenging gnatcatcher listing
It seems that every other year brings a new challenge to the listing of the Coastal California Gnatcatcher. Just a year after fending off yet another delisting attempt by Southern California developers, Audubon California learned in late 2017 that these same interests had filed a lawsuit to compel the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service to reconsider its decision. Soon afterward, Audubon California joined the Natural Resources Defense Council, Center for Biological Diversity, Endangered Habitats League and Laguna Greenbelt to intervene in the suit to ensure that the listing decision is sufficiently defended.